Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Am J Prev Med ; 2023 Apr 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2292520

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: People with disabilities face unique challenges that may affect skin cancer prevention, diagnosis, and access to treatment. These challenges could be exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2022, the prevalence of self-reported skin cancer diagnoses, delayed medical care because of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and skin cancer risk factors among people with disabilities were estimated. METHODS: Data from the 2020 National Health Interview Survey (N=31,568 U.S. adults) were analyzed. Skin cancer diagnosis, age at the time of skin cancer diagnosis, skin cancer risk factors (e.g., sun protection), and delayed medical care because of the COVID-19 pandemic were included. Disability status was measured using the Washington Group Short Set on Functioning, which includes vision, hearing, mobility, communication, self-care, and cognitive disabilities. RESULTS: Although 8.8% of U.S. adults reported having a disability, people with disabilities accounted for 14.7% of all self-reported skin cancer diagnoses, including 17.5% of melanoma diagnoses. Notably, people with disabilities were on average, older (mean age=59.8 years) than people without disabilities (mean age=46.8 years). Models that adjusted for age and other demographics revealed that people with disabilities had higher odds of delaying medical care because of the COVID-19 pandemic (OR=1.65, 95% CI=1.41, 1.94); people with disabilities reported being diagnosed with skin cancer later in life (age 61.5 vs 54.0 years; p<0.001) but had odds of reporting any skin cancer (OR=1.11, 95% CI=0.93, 1.32) or melanoma diagnosis (OR=1.33, 95% CI=0.95, 1.87) similar to those of people without disabilities. CONCLUSIONS: Because of disability-related challenges, older age, and delaying medical care during the pandemic, people with disabilities may be at increased risk for inequitable skin cancer outcomes.

2.
J Tissue Viability ; 30(3): 462-464, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1253297

ABSTRACT

Hydroxyurea is a chemotherapeutic agent used for myeloproliferative disorders and sickle cell anemia that is well known to cause painful mucocutaneous ulcers, typically involving the legs or mouth. However, genital ulcerations due to hydroxyurea therapy are a rare, and likely underrecognized, adverse effect with only a few cases reported in the literature to date. Ulcers of the lower legs caused by hydroxyurea are associated with a diagnostic delay, and this is likely exacerbated in cases of genital ulceration due to a lack of awareness. Herein we present two cases of painful genital ulceration in patients on hydroxyurea therapy. In the first Case, an 87 year-old male with polycythemia vera developed an ulcer on the scrotum, which was assessed initially through virtual visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, and was refractory to topical and oral antibiotic treatments. The second case was a 79 year-old male with essential thrombocythemia and a history of persistent leg ulcers who developed erosions of the glans penis. Both patients experienced complete resolution within weeks of discontinuing hydroxyurea therapy. In conclusion, genital ulcers and erosions induced by hydroxyrea may be underrecognized in clinical practice, but if identified, withdrawal of hydroxyurea leads to quick resolution of these lesions and the associated pain.


Subject(s)
Hydroxyurea/adverse effects , Leg Ulcer/chemically induced , Ulcer/chemically induced , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Hydroxyurea/administration & dosage , Male , Myeloproliferative Disorders/drug therapy , Polycythemia Vera/drug therapy , Scrotum
3.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 7(9): ofaa396, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-909878

ABSTRACT

Proper disinfection using adequate disinfecting agents will be necessary for infection control strategies against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, limited guidance exists on effective surface disinfectants or best practices for their use against severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2. We outlined a process of fully characterizing over 350 products on the Environmental Protection Agency List N, including pH, method of delivery, indication for equipment sterilization, and purchase availability. We then developed a streamlined set of guidelines to help rapidly evaluate and select suitable disinfectants from List N, including practicality, efficacy, safety, and cost/availability. This resource guides the evaluation of ideal disinfectants amidst practical considerations posed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL